Eldad and Medad- The Prophetic Pattern

In Numbers 11: 24-29, there is a short parenthetical story of two prophets who serve as models or types of the believer today.  They are Eldad and Medad, two characters who show up this one time in scripture, and then disappear into obscurity.

Numbers 11:24-29:

And Moses goeth out, and speaketh unto the people the words of Jehovah, and gathereth seventy men of the elders of the people, and causeth them to stand round about the tent,
and Jehovah cometh down in the cloud, and speaketh unto him, and keepeth back of the Spirit which is on him, and putteth on the seventy men of the elders; and it cometh to pass at the resting of the Spirit on them, that they prophesy, and do not cease.
 And two of the men are left in the camp, the name of the one is Eldad, and the name of the second Medad, and the spirit resteth upon them, (and they are among those written, and have not gone out to the tent), and they prophesy in the camp;
 and the young man runneth, and declareth to Moses, and saith, `Eldad and Medad are prophesying in the camp.’
 And Joshua son of Nun, minister of Moses, one of his young men, answereth and saith, `My lord Moses, restrain them.’
 And Moses saith to him, `Art thou zealous for me? O that all Jehovah’s people were prophets! that Jehovah would put His Spirit upon them!’

The first note that should be pointed out is that when it is written that they were all “prophesying” it should not be understood that they were necessarily predicting the future, or screeching about the end of the world, or destruction or what not.   In context, the reason why God took a portion of His Spirit from Moses, and put it on the 70, was because Moses was feeling worn out by the complaints and demands of the congregation.  (Specifically, about the lack of meat).   The 70 elders prophesying was the solution, in that they were going to provide the spiritual “moral support” for Moses at the time.  Thus, we can expect that they were praising God, affirming God’s faithfulness and the like.  In 1 Cor 14 3, we learn that prophesy is for the “Edification (upbuilding), exhortation, and comfort” of those who hear it.  The goal of prophesy is the build up the  listeners, to establish them in the faith, as well as challenge (exhort) and console them.   In this sense, it is the same goal that we have as believers when we share God’s word with someone else.   We need not think of it as becoming a “wild eyed” preacher of doom.

QUESTION 1:  What was the MEANS by which the 70 Elders prophesied?
Obviously, it is was the addition of the Spirit, the anointing of God that enabled them.  We mistakenly think sometimes that sharing the words of edification, exhortation and comfort are reserved for those with a Masters of Divinity, or Bible School degree.  Not the case.  The Holy Spirit does the effective enabling.  In the story above, the 70 received the special and unique anointing, prophesied, and they stopped.   The distinction between us and them is that we have the same Holy Spirit… but living ALL THE TIME on the inside of us.   When the believers where filled on the day of Pentecost by the Holy Spirit, they all prophesied and spoke in tongues.  (The prophesying aspect we are told in 1 Corinthians 14 is the more beneficial gifting).    As believers, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, “prophesying” to others is, or should be a normative thing.  We should allowing God to use us to edify and encourage others.  We sometimes are silent because we don’t feel we are qualified, or scared of saying the wrong thing.  But it is God’s Spirit that makes us effective — our own intellect notwithstanding.

QUESTION 2:  What was the MEDIUM or place of Activity that Eldad and Medad prophesied?
This is one of the things that set them apart.   Whereas the 70 elders all prophesied up at the Tent of Meeting (think of that as our modern day “church”) … Eldad and Medad prophesied in the CAMP — that is, where everyone lived their day -to-day lives.    Think of how that is analogous today.    For us, it is very easy to say “Praise the Lord”, or quote bible verse in church.  It very easy, even expected, to talk about what God has done for you— in church.   But Eldad and Medad broke out of that box.   It challenges us to think about what we will say and share with others at work, and at home, and with siblings, parents, or generally out in public.  That is where it gets a little more challenging.  Eldad and Medad serves as examples for us… believers who live out loud in the public square, not simply cloistered in a church.

QUESTION 3:  What were Eldad’s and Medad’s motives?
When the young man ran to Moses and Joshua to complain about them, what was being called into question was their motives.  The fact that they were continuing to prophesy and do it everywhere made some in leadership nervous.  Perhaps Joshua was thinking that if the Spirit that was on Moses was now on Eldad and Medad, that his future as the heir apparent of Moses was now threatened.  Or perhaps the two of them would stage a coup, like Korah had done.  Moses answer to Joshua makes it clear that it was a concern for leadership roles that spurred on the request to make them stop.

Now the Bible doesn’t say anything specific about their motives.  And you don’t see these two characters again.   However, it is interesting that the Bible is very specific about the names of these two obscure characters.   And many of us know that the Bible, in many cases, is very specific about names because the meaning of names was very significant.  Between Moses, Abraham, Jesus, Barnabas, and scores of others, the placement of one’s name is frequently there to tell you something about the character.  In this case or Eldad and Medad — the former name means either “God Loves” or “Loves God”, depending on what is the direct object in the phrase.   Medad means “He is loved” or “He loves (others)” with the same caveat.   So you could understand “Eldad and Medad” to be “Loves God and Loves Others”.   And that might same something about their motives and character.  After all, that is the so-called “Golden Rule” right there.

Eldad and Medad serves are a pattern for us.   The depended up God’s Spirt… they kept prophesying and didn’t stop.  They spoke out in the real world… not just reserving their words for those in church.  And they were motivated by love for God and man, rather than a position, or title, or recognition.   Moses says that he wishes that all of God’s people had that spirit and were prophets.   Well on the day of Pentecost, that came true.   Paul shares the same sentiment in 1 Cor 14, where he says that we should especially covet to prophesy, and he desired that everyone would.

Teachers Shall incur a Greater Judgment

Not many of you should consider yourselves teachers brothers, knowing that teachers will incur a greater judgment.  James 3:1

There is principle in scripture regarding the accountability of all human beings in accordance with the knowledge that they have received.

Jesus said that the servant who knew his master’s will and didn’t do it will be beaten with many stripes, but the servant who didn’t know his will and didn’t do it will be beaten with few. (Luke 12:47-49)

A teacher of God’s word… whether they are accurate or not…Will be held to a higher accountability than one who is ignorant and makes no pretense of knowing anything.

We instinctively know the concept.  For example, if a 17 year old high school dropout violated a tax code. law because they didn’t report some money they made as a baby sitter, we get that they would be ignorant of the various self employment tax forms.  However, if a very sharp tax attorney failed to report money they received from a client, we are comfortable with the insinuation that tax fraud is going on.  Why?  Simply because we know that tax attorney simply knew better.  The tax attorney is guilty, but the high school dropout, although still in arrears, is guiltless.

Implicit in this is an answer to one of the most common questions asked by non-christians about the faith.  I refer to it as the “pygmy question”‘.   It is “what about all the people (ie. Pygmies in Africa) who have never heard the gospel?”

Simply put, God holds those who are in the “know” to a higher standard than those who are ignorant of his word and his ways.

 

happy shavuot!

Today is known by many as Pentecost Sunday.  You know the story.  The holy spirit descends, people speak in tongues, the church is born.

However, the day of the event is not arbitrary.  There was a reason why the believers had to wait for the promise from the father.  The day itself is a holy day on the biblical calendar.  It is the feast of weeks, or shavuot.   The holy day marks something incredibly significant….it is the anniversary of the giving of the law, and the beginning of the old covenant.

That covenant- although it was given by God, is called a ministry of death or condemnation.   The law is good…but it reveals that we ourselves are lawbreakers.  Thus, it produces only death.  The holy spirit troll on the same day to become the fulfilment of completion of that covenant… a new covenant of Grace and life… not condemnation and death.

Taming the Toungue …

“If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s religion is vain.”   James 1: 26

Humans can be devout.  They can express an outward religiousness on demand.  It gives us a sense of pride, in a way, to have a piety that people notice.

We all know the religious person that wears their holiness on their sleeve.   They might attend multiple services each week.  They “behave’ in all the proper religious ways.  They don’t cheat on their spouse.  They might read their Bible on a regular basis.  They don’t struggle with drug addiction, or alcoholism.    Nothing wrong with any of that.

However, when they open their mouth, you know that there is something askew.   Criticism, judgment, and sarcasm leaves their lips.   They have something negative to say about everything and everyone.   They excel in delivering a verbal beating to either you, or someone else you know.

The Bible tells us that out of the abundance of the hearth, the mouth speaks.   With such a person, you have a fairly good thermometer of what is in their heart.   Despite their outward religiousness, a tongue that just injures, gossips and criticizes can tell you that their heart is far from the peace and joy that knows Christ.  James says here that their religious is in vain, not because their religion in itself can gain them anything, but that their tongue reveals it is no “religion” at all… merely a pretense covering over a darkened and distant heart.
Rather the Bible says that we should:

“Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers”.
  (Eph 4:29)

That is the tongue of the righteous.  It imparts grace.  It edifies.  It builds up, encourages, and strengthens.

Keep a tight reign on your tongue.  Practice using it for imparting life and grace… to be a well of refreshing, rather than a poisoned spring that sickens and kills.   James goes on to say that both sweet and bitter water do not come forth from the same spring.  Let the words of your mouth tell of the grace that is in your heart.

Jesus’ Triumphal Entry- and Cleansing the Temple

Today is frequently referred to as Palm Sunday.  the reference comes from event in the last week of Jesus’ earthly when he entered Jerusalem and the throngs placed palms before him.

One cannot help but to be reminded of similar arrival of David in Jerusalem some one thousand  years earlier. In that case, he was bringing in the ark of the covenant.  Jesus was the true ark, or presence of God.  In the case of David, he danced before the Lord as the ark came in, and the people celebrated joyfully.  In the case of Jesus, people rejoiced and celebrated that the ark of the New Covenant was arriving.

The Bible says specifically that it was the week of the Passover, he feast of Unleavened Bread. this is significant because Jesus’ life and ministry was ordered and revolved around the Jewish feasts.

In Judaism, in the days just before the Feast of Unleavened Bread begins, the house is scoured and cleaned of any leaven. Leaven, or yeast, is a type or symbol of sin or wickedness, as we read in 1 Cor 5:7.8:

“Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.”

 

In verse 10, the “leaven” is identified not only with the sexual immoral (which Paul, in this context is calling the Corinthians out for). but also the “greedy and swindlers”.   Jesus, in fulfillment of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, would likewise “clean house” of such leaven.   We read in the Bible that when he entered Jerusalem in this “Triumphal Entry” that he went right to the Temple.    There, he found the money changers, and merchants who were capitalizing on the pilgrims that had come to Jerusalem for the feast.  Those merchants and money changers were greedy opportunists- frequently gouging the faithful that needed either their money changed, or in need of purchasing an animal for the sacrifice.

Jesus took care of the leaven in the house. (Matthew 21:12,13)

And Jesus entered the temple[b] and drove out all who sold and bought in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers and the seats of those who sold pigeons. 13 He said to them, “It is written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer,’ but you make it a den of robbers.”

.It is one thing, as we see in modern Judaism, to physically remove the leavened items in preparation for the Feast.  However, as Jesus demonstrated, that is merely a symbolic action of what God intended.   God wants us to sanctify ourselves- purging the sin, malice, immorality, greed, and any other impurity- from our lives.   And Christ can do it, just as he did 2,000 years ago.

Easter and Passover… — Does it Matter?

 

jesus against the easter bunnyRecently a friend posted a video online about how to incorporate the truths about the resurrection of Christ into the “normal” celebration of Easter …. which was presumably all about Easter Egg hunts, plastic “grass”, chocolate and spring bonnets.

Call me crazy, but as Bible-believing Christians, I don’t know why in the world we would ever let it get this far, or why we wouldn’t just clearly identify that which has nothing to do with Christ, and is simply a carryover from Babylonian paganism.   What are we afraid of?

The very word “Easter”- drawn from the goddesses name Oester-  should be an anathema to a Christian.  The Passover, the Jewish feast which Jesus fulfilled, is so rich in truth, so meaningful to our salvation, that to obscure it with fertility symbols, and chocolate and candy is an affront to God.  Why do we make such a costly concession to the secular/pagan world?

The Bible says that Jesus was raised on “First Fruits” … part of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which happened on the 3rd day after the Passover.  Paul confirms in 1 Cor. 15:20 that the Resurrection of Christ was “The First Fruits”.   It wasn’t until hundreds of years later, that, in a fit of anti-Semitism, the church adopted the hybrid idea of “Easter” and separated it from the biblical holiday of Passover and First Fruits.

Your can get more detail on that right here:  http://www.earlychurch.net/easter.htm

 

Tis the Reason for the Season …

For most Christians today, December 25th is treated as one of the most sacred days of the year. We use numerous slogans to reinforce that- from “Keep Christ in Christmas”, “Wise Men Still Seek Him”, and others, like “He is the Reason for the Season”.

For many, the season is full of family traditions, and loaded with emotional meaning.

Virtually all Bible-Believing Christians are familiar with the text in Mark 7:13 where Jesus blasts the Pharisees of his day because they “Nullified the Word of God by their traditions”, and those sincere Christians assent to the idea that it is a bad thing to put tradition ahead of the Word of God. However, we always imagine that it is someone elses tradition. What about if it was OUR tradition?

Before the reader progresses here, the question must be answered: If was apparent that my denominational or family tradition was contrary to God’s Word, would I be willing to dump the tradition? If your answer is “No”, then you don’t need to read any farther.
The Christmas Tradition
As mentioned, Christmas has grown to be the most recognizable day on the ecclesiastical calendar. As Christians, we associate with the birth of Christ in Bethlehem.

Ironically, most Christians also understand that Jesus was almost certainly not born in December. Everything in the Bible about his birth hints against that. For several hundred years after Christ, there was no indication in the writings of church leaders that December 25th had any significance to the church. We talk about his birth at this time of year, with a wink and shrug, acknowledging to the world at the outset that as Christians, we are purporting a fanciful myth. We say “well, we don’t know the actual day, but this is as good a day as any”. So is December 25th really a day we ought to be celebrating?

Where the December 25th Date Came From
Where did the date December 25h come from then? The actual date does have an ancient history of being recognized as a holy day- more over, as the birth day of a god.

In Persia, it was the rebirth of Nimrod, and later, that of Mithras. In Egypt, the birth of the Sun god Osiris. In Rome, it was the festival of Saturnalia, which climaxed on the 25th with the “Brumalia”. Later in the 3rd century, many of the pagan traditions were consolidated into the Natalis Dies Solis Invicti, or “Birth Day of the Unconquered Sun”.

Other nations, before the entrance of Christianity, had their celebrations on that day, including the Norse “Yule” festivals in Scandinavian countries.

In most cases, the celebration involved either evergreen branches made into wreaths, adorned with candles, or a whole evergreen tree, adorned with silver and gold amulets of Bacchus, the god of wine and merriment. It usually involved the exchanging of gifts, also.

It is of critical importance to realize that these celebrations existed in the Roman and Hellenistic cultures at larger during the early formative years of the church, and it was a given that Christians wouldn’t take part in such idolatry.

Tertullian, one of the greatest apologists in the Christian church in the 3rd century remarked in his writing “On Idolatry” that some Christians were backsliding, and starting to mimic the pagan practices of Brumalia in December (Later called Natalis Solis Invictus) by decorating their doors with lights and wreaths:

But “let your works shine,” saith He; but now all our shops and gates shine! You will now-a-days find more doors of heathens without lamps and wreaths than of Christians. What does the case seem to be with regard to that species (of ceremony) also? If it is an idol’s honour, without doubt an idol’s honour is idolatry. If it is for a man’s sake, let us again consider that all idolatry is for man’s sake; let us again consider that all idolatry is a worship done to men, since it is generally agreed even among their worshipers that aforetime the gods themselves of the nations were men; and so it makes no difference whether that superstitious homage be rendered to men of a former age or of this. Idolatry is condemned, not on account of the persons which are set up for worship, but on account of those its observances, which pertain to demons (Tertullian. On Idolatry, Chapter XV.)

The true church of Jesus Christ at the time was NOT observing December 25th. On the contrary. To adorn an evergreen tree with decorations and lights was a sign a believer had become totally backsliden.

At this time, there was some speculation by some Christian writers of 2nd and 3rd century when Christ might have been born… but no one even considered a time in December. Some thought a date in April. Some thought March. Many now think that, seeing that the great events of Christ’s life were orchestrated around Jewish Holy Days, that they Feast of Tabernacles in the Fall would be a likely time. (This would seem to be also alluded to in the Gospel of John, when John specifically mentions how Christ, the Word of God, dwelt or literally was “tabernacled” with us, when speaking of his incarnation. -John 1:14).

The tipping point happened in the 4th century, when the Roman Emperor Constantine, who spent most of his life as a sun worshiper, set by royal decree, the birth of Christ to December 25th., in 336 AD. It is clear that his only motivation to pick that date was to correspond with Natalis Solis Invicti, and thus “synchronize” the Holy Days of the pagan empire with the growing Christian population. The church apparently succumbed to his wishes without too much resistance. The Roman bishops decreed that the day would be marked with a special “Mass”, thus “Christ’s Mass” began.

So at this point, many might ask what is wrong with celebrating the day on December 25th, if there is a “new meaning” associated with it? Over the years, church leaders loosely use the phrase that the pagan holiday has been “baptized” and now it is thoroughly Christian. After all, no Christian is actually worshiping Mithras or Solis Invictus on December 25th, right?

The first problem we should have with this is that all the cultural adornment of the pagan holiday came charging right into the church. The pagan December 25th holiday was marked by decorating and lighting an evergreen tree, and parties for exchanging gifts. That might sound familiar. As an afterthought, some Christians like to say that the “gift giving” has to do with the Magi bringing gifts to Jesus (it doesn’t) … but they are of course, at a total loss to explain what a decorated tree has to do with the birth of Christ! To make it worse in the west during our contemporary times, the folklore of Santa Claus and Rudolph have far eclipsed the artificial veneer about Jesus anyways. It is, at best, a secular holiday. At worst, its a continuation of the idolatrous practices that the church of Jesus Christ rejected from the outset.

When you attempt to make a synthetic holiday by adopting anything from paganism, you simply pollute the truth. Look for example, how the church now celebrates Christ’s resurrection with the synthetic holiday “Easter”- the very word being derived from a Babylonian goddess of fertility. The ensuing confusing has made the emblems of the supposed Holy Day colored eggs and bunny rabbits, the symbols of the goddess after who the day is named. The church attempted the same thing by “baptizing” the pagan holiday of Samhain, the feast of the dead, as “All Saint’s Day” (Old English “All Hallows Eve ie “Halloween”). The Christian name stuck, but otherwise there is nothing “Christian” about it.

Here is a serious question that is germane to the whole issue: Looking at the Bible in it’s entirety, when God’s people were confronted with the cultural practices of a pagan land were they A) Told to assimilate those practices into their worship, and “baptize” them with a new name, or B) Told to utterly detest, reject, and abstain from the pagan practices, in favor of following God’s Word?

Here are just three places where you can clearly see the answer:
“Be careful not to be ensnared by inquiring about their (the heathen nations) gods, saying, “How do these nations serve their gods? We will do the same.” (Deuteronomy 12:30)

“Drive out all the inhabitants of the land before you. Destroy all their carved images and their cast idols, and demolish all their high places.” (Numbers 33:52)

“They imitated the nations around them although the LORD had ordered them, “Do not do as they do,” and they did the things the LORD had forbidden them to do.” (2 Kings 17:15)

There are scores of places in the Old and New Testament where God reiterates in no uncertain terms that God’s people are not to adopt the religious practices of the heathen. When his covenant people did, it was considered sin, and they had to repent of it. They were told not only to not follow after the other gods…they were told to not worship the LORD in the same manner that the pagans worshiped their gods!

So what the church did in the 4th Century, at Constantine’s behest, stands in clear opposition to what God commanded not only Israel, but the church regarding idolatry. And inasmuch as we follow the lead set by Constantine, we are continuing that error.

Where that Leaves us Today
The majority of Christians today realize that December 25th really isn’t Christ’s birthday. Many sincere bible-believing Christians know this, and even recognize the pagan origin of much of the trappings of Christmas…. but they will still celebrate it.

Sometimes it is just an emotional attachment to the glee of opening gifts, to the familiar Christmas music, or to the special traditional family time. But as mentioned at the outset… what really is more important.. following our familiar traditions, or following the Word of God?

Some Bible believing Christians see the holiday in pragmatic terms- although it is not really Jesus’ birthday, but a thinly disguised pagan holiday, they figure they can use it to introduce others to church or the Gospel. However, what are we really communicating about the Gospel if our segue to the unchurched is clearly pagan mythology that, at the core, really has nothing to do with the truth of the Gospel?
Others will just go along with it, because everyone else does. However the majority on anything is rarely right. And it is the man or woman of principle and courage that resists the group-think tendencies of the majority, and stands apart for what is right.

Ultimately it is a matter of conscience. In Romans 13, Paul tells us that one may consider a day more holy than another, while one may consider them all the same. However, that still needs to be squared with the biblical admonitions against idolatry, and our desire to walk in the truth, in a way that is compromised by the culture.

Rosh Hashanah and The Second Coming

Sunday marks the beginning of the “High Holy Days” in Judaism, with Rosh Hashanah beginning at sunset. To many of us in Christendom, this might be little more than a piece of trivia that we can tuck away in our “general religious knowledge” folder, however, the event has specific significance to us as believers. Jesus’ life and ministry revolved around the biblical holidays, of which Rosh Hashanah is one.

Jesus came into the temple at the beginning of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, was crucified on Passover, rose from the dead on the Feast of First Fruits, and when he ascended, he made sure his followers understood that the next major event for them was the descent of the Holy Spirit, which God coordinated with the Jewish feast of Pentecost. Can you see the pattern? Every major event that had to do with our redemption was tied to a particular aspect of the Jewish feasts in the Spring. It doesn’t end there.

It is fairly clear, based on the writings of Paul, John, and the words of Jesus, that Christ’s second coming is in a similar fashion, tied to the Jewish holy days in the fall. For example, the beginning of Rosh Hashanah is marked by the blowing of the Shofar, or trumpet, and the most common element in the Bible where it talks about the Second coming is preceded by the blowing of a trumpet. (1 Thess 4:16-17, 1 Cor 15:52, Rev 4:1 ).

And the other most talked about element is how the nations of the earth will be raging against Israel. And it just so happens that right now, perhaps more than ever, Jerusalem, is a tinderbox that could be in for some troubling time. Consider how close the appearance of the Lord might be! While many of us go about our business, stop and take an inventory that the Day of the Lord may be drawing very near. Not trying to scare anyone, or persuade them that we are in the final stretch,.but consider soberly “what if”, for whatever reason, we should have to stand before God today?

If you are available Sunday, come and share in the Word of God with us– Faunce Memorial Church in Plymouth this Sunday . (EWF)

Cain and Abel – (Part 2)

Then the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.

In part 1, we saw how God rejected Cain’s offering, but accepted Abel’s. This is a clear foreshadowing of how we relate to God, with Cain’s labors or “works” earning him nothing before God, but the lamb that Abel presented made him perfectly righteous, just as our “lamb of God” (Jesus) makes us righteous, while our works avail nothing.

Cain’s response is one of envy and bitterness. The “unfairness”, in his one perspective, overwhelms his discretion and his pent up hostility becomes evident to the Lord, prompting the question “why is your face downcast?”. One can picture, much like the story of the older brother in the Gospel story of the Prodigal Son, how the God’s graciousness and mercy can become repugnant to those who self-righteously seek to justify themselves in God’s eyes. The self-righteous despise the idea of God freely granting favor and mercy to those whom they deem less worthy than themselves. Consequently, God does not accept their offering. For by the works of the law will no flesh be justified.

The Lord tells Cain that sin is “crouching at the door… but you must rule over it”. Over the years, many moralistic sermons have been preached from many pulpits on the need to gain mastery over sin, citing this verse. Perhaps this verse might better serve that cause if Cain had indeed “mastered” the sin that desired to conquer him. But of course, in slaying his brother, he proved his impotence at mastering sin, even when God himself had gravely warned him of its presence.

Many people presume that under such circumstances, they would fare better. However, the example with Cain shows the true condition of the natural man. On our own, even with God clearly telling us what is right and wrong, and with all the admonitions from God’s Word, we still are overcome by sin. The natural man is wholly unable to master it. We are truly, on our own, just made of flesh- born from earthdust and prone to moral failure.

Paul bemoans this “body of death” in Romans 7:24. The flesh is always drawn down as if sin were an irresistible gravitational force that can only be temporarily fought, but ultimately, vanquishes our highest intentions. The answer, Paul concludes, is that Christ has broken the power and sting of sin, by reckoning us as “crucified” with him. Whereas the natural man cannot overcome sin, in Christ, our old nature is truly “dead” to sin. It can’t be tempted, or drawn away when it is dead!. The answer to overcoming sin isn’t fighting it. That would be a “work” …simply glorifying our own will power if we should perchance win a battle against temptation. Rather, it is seeing our old nature as dead and gone, and seeing our new life as completely in Christ.

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.14